Why terrorism fails

by | May 22, 2008


Noticed while browsing the ever insightful Kevin Drum: The graph, from the Human Security Report 2007 shows that as terrorist incidents have risen in Pakistan, opposition to terrorism has also risen. The report goes onto suggest that ‘terror campaigns that lose public support will eventually be abandoned, even if the terrorists themselves remain undefeated.’ This is something government’s understand but their actions suggest otherwise. The idea that without public support terrorism will fail is, I think, the principle reason for why the UK Government has switched a good chunk of its resources to the Prevent strand of CONTEST.

Author

  • Charlie Edwards

    Charlie Edwards is Director of National Security and Resilience Studies at the Royal United Services Institute. Prior to RUSI he was a Research Leader at the RAND Corporation focusing on Defence and Security where he conducted research and analysis on a broad range of subject areas including: the evaluation and implementation of counter-violent extremism programmes in Europe and Africa, UK cyber strategy, European emergency management, and the role of the internet in the process of radicalisation. He has undertaken fieldwork in Iraq, Somalia, and the wider Horn of Africa region.

    View all posts

More from Global Dashboard

Let’s make climate a culture war!

Let’s make climate a culture war!

If the politics of climate change end up polarised, is that so bad?  No – it’s disastrous. Or so I’ve long thought. Look at the US – where climate is even more polarised than abortion. Result: decades of flip flopping. Ambition under Clinton; reversal...