100 WEF CEOs argue per capita convergence ahead of G8

by | Jun 26, 2008


WEF has just published a statement on climate change ahead of the G8 from what appears more or less all of the world’s CEOs (A is for ABB, Abercrombie & Kent, Agility, AIG, Airbus, AkzoNobel, Alcoa, AMD, ANA, Anglo American, Arup; B is for Bain & Co., Bayer, BG Group, Booz & Co., BP, British Airways, BC Hydro, BT… oh, you get the idea).  They say this:

Addressing climate change will require clear and honest communication as to the scale of the challenge we all face.  Lord Stern describes the problem for us succinctly:

“Current annual global emission flows are around 40-45 Gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent (GtC02-eq).

About 45% of current global emissions come from developing countries and this is set to grow.

A 50% reduction in global emissions by 2050 equates to an aggregate annual flow of around 22GtC02-eq.

As there will be around 9 billion people in 2050, this implies per capita emissions per year of about 2-2.5 tonnes CO2-eq.

Currently, US emissions are more than 20 tonnes of CO2-eq per person per year, Europe and Japan 10-15 tonnes, China 5 or more tonnes, India around 1.5 and most of Africa much less than 1 tonne CO2-eq per person per year.

The consequence is that rich countries will have to take the lead and demonstrate strong cuts.

Since around 8 billion people will be in currently developing countries, those countries will also have to be in the range of 2-2.5 tonnes CO2-eq by 2050, otherwise the world average for the total would be unachievable. 

Refreshing to see some actual numbers rather than the usual guff about “developed countries taking the lead”, isn’t it?

Author


More from Global Dashboard

Let’s make climate a culture war!

Let’s make climate a culture war!

If the politics of climate change end up polarised, is that so bad?  No – it’s disastrous. Or so I’ve long thought. Look at the US – where climate is even more polarised than abortion. Result: decades of flip flopping. Ambition under Clinton; reversal...