Andrew Mitchell, Shadow International Development Secretary on BBC News earlier :
We will have a national security council under a Conservative government which will ensure all these different departments and all these different activities are wired in closely together.
Sure – it’s the wiring that’s the issue.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lN-VeeE-FVc[/youtube]
184 service personnel have died in Afghanistan since 2001. The tragic deaths of eight men who died last week in a single 24-hour period has brought the conflict home. Newspapers are abuzz with consternation and criticism. Newspapers have been awash with editorials setting out their respective views and ideas of what the UK and wider coalition should do. Below are the highlights.
Background:
The UK Af-Pak Strategy is here.
The US Af-Pak Strategy is here . (pdf)
Last week’s G8 saw more rumblings of dissatisfaction from China about the US dollar’s continuing role as the world’s reserve currency: State Councillor Dai Bingguo said in a statement to the G8+5 that,
We should have a better system for reserve currency issuance and regulation, so that we can maintain relative stability of major reserve currencies’ exchange rates and promote a diversified and rational international reserve currency system.
This is the latest in a series of such statements from China, building on Wen Jiabao saying he was “worried” about China’s stash of US T-bills in March, central bank governor Zhou Xiaochuan‘s essay on reform of the international monetary system a couple of weeks later, and then China’s $120bn contribution to an Asian emergency currency pool in May – potentially an important step towards an “Asian IMF”.
So if / when the dollar does lose its perch as the world’s reserve currency – something that isn’t likely to happen in the short term, admittedly – then what are the candidates to replace it? (more…)
The Sunday Times has a piece today on Mark Malloch Brown’s reasons for standing down as a Foreign Office minister – based on detailed quotes from a “colleague”. Excerpts:
“Mark said that the goldfish bowl nature of Westminster and the pressures of the 24-hour news cycle meant there wasa lack of strategic thinking in British politics – on both sides of the political divide. [He] felt there was a contrast between the professionalism and long-term planning that happened in the countries where he acted as a consultant [such as Chile and the Philippines] and the chaotic nature of Whitehall.”
Also this:
Behind the scenes Malloch-Brown tried to lobby Brown to uphold his promise to hold a “comprehensive” inquiry into the Iraq war. However, when last month Brown announced the investigation was to be carried out in secret, Malloch-Brown was furious.
“Mark was incandescent. This was not what why he signed up to being a minister,” said a colleague. “He tried to contact the prime minister, but he was away travelling. In the end he spoke to Gus O’Donnell [the cabinet secretary] and told him what he thought.”
Within days of the prime minister’s original statement, the government executed a U-turn and said that some hearings would after all be held in public. “Mark was satisfied with the final outcome,” said a colleague. “But I think the incident left a sour taste.”
Full article here.