How green is your stimulus?

by | Mar 19, 2009


Nick Robins at HSBC has just sent over a copy of their excellent report A Climate for Recovery, which compares the green element of economic recovery plans around the world: must read stuff. 

Among the headline findings: governments around the world have so far allocated $430bn to climate-related themes, with the US and China in the lead; and that the key benefiting sectors include rail, water infrastructure, power grids and building energy efficiency, but renewables less so (apart from in the US).

Especially interesting is the table breaking down recovery plans by countries.  A whopping 37.8% of China’s stimulus package is counted as green, but the real laurel wreath here goes to South Korea, at 80.5%.  The US is at 18.2%. (Britain? Down at 2.1%. Not that that stopped our Gordon from handing down a lengthy disquisition on the importance of climate change when he made his speech to Congress…)

HSBC profess themselves hopeful that what we’ve seen so far is just the first installment, with more to come.  Let’s hope so – but given the trouble Tim Geithner’s been having trying to get Europe to cough up more for fiscal stimulus, I’m not holding my breath for the London Summit…

Author

  • Alex Evans

    Alex Evans is founder of Larger Us, which explores how we can use psychology to reduce political tribalism and polarisation, a senior fellow at New York University, and author of The Myth Gap: What Happens When Evidence and Arguments Aren’t Enough? (Penguin, 2017). He is a former Campaign Director of the 50 million member global citizen’s movement Avaaz, special adviser to two UK Cabinet Ministers, climate expert in the UN Secretary-General’s office, and was Research Director for the Business Commission on Sustainable Development. Alex lives with his wife and two children in Yorkshire.

    View all posts

More from Global Dashboard

Let’s make climate a culture war!

Let’s make climate a culture war!

If the politics of climate change end up polarised, is that so bad?  No – it’s disastrous. Or so I’ve long thought. Look at the US – where climate is even more polarised than abortion. Result: decades of flip flopping. Ambition under Clinton; reversal...