More bad news for McCain. The Huffington Post leads with an article on links between the head of his transition team and Saddam Hussein:
William Timmons, the Washington lobbyist who John McCain has named to head his presidential transition team, aided an influence effort on behalf of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein to ease international sanctions against his regime.
The two lobbyists who Timmons worked closely with over a five year period on the lobbying campaign later either pleaded guilty to or were convicted of federal criminal charges that they had acted as unregistered agents of Saddam Hussein’s government.
As regular readers will be aware, I’ve long admired the courageous approach to public diplomacy taken by the US Department of Homeland Security, particularly in the fantastically Byzantine process that is immigration at New York’s John F Kennedy airport.
Now, DHS are raising their game to a whole new level. As frequent travellers will know, in order to qualify for the US visa waiver program, visitors from overseas now have to apply for special authorisation to do so. But what really completes the web experience is a thoughtful, unique touch: when you arrive at the web page to fill out your application, you’re greeted with a special pop-up message – I’m not kidding – that reads as follows:
This Department of Homeland Security (DHS) computer system and any related equipment is subject to monitoring for administrative oversight, law enforcement, criminal investigative purposes, inquiries into alleged wrongdoing or misuse, and to ensure proper performance of applicable security features and procedures. As part of this monitoring, DHS may acquire, access, retain, intercept, capture, retrieve, record, read, inspect, analyze, audit, copy and disclose any information processed, transmitted, received, communicated, and stored within the computer system. If monitoring reveals possible misuse or criminal activity, notice of such may be provided to appropriate supervisory personnel and law enforcement officials. DHS may conduct these activities in any manner without further notice. By clicking OK below or by using this system, you consent to the terms set forth in this notice.
Wow. That wins the prize by a country mile for the least welcoming, most f**k-you way to arrive at a website that I’ve ever seen in my life. I’m lost for words.
Readers of this blog will be familiar with ourenthusiasm for Web 2.0 especially when used in times of emergency. Following the London bombings a wikipedia page was created at 09:18, twenty eight minutes after the first explosion. Since then the wikipedia page has been updated on a regular basis – the last entry was made on the 11th October 2008.
People around the globe contribute to the article around the clock – the first 24 hours of page editing is captured in the following neat video.
My erstwhile DFID colleague Owen Barder knows a thing or two about finance and financial services (he has, after all, been a private secretary to the Chancellor of the Exchequer and then Tony Blair’s economic affairs private secretary at Number 10, among other interesting jobs). Over on his blog, Owen’s now ruminating about the fact that since Gordon has nationalised our banks, we’re all shareholders. And he has a message for his new employees.
To the managers of the banks
Every time I have suggested things you might do differently, I have been told that this is impossible as you are under an obligation to pursue the interests of your shareholders.
Now that I am – unexpectedly – one of your shareholders, I expect you’d like to know what I would like you to do. Here are seven new instructions to be getting on with.
1. Short-term profits are not important: what is important is long-term value. I would like you to stop chasing short term arbitrage opportunities and overnight trading and focus on identifying and investing in the best-run, most productive and valuable enterprises. There will be no trading in derivatives or other purely financial products.
2. Cut executive pay immediately. From now on, nobody in the bank will get paid more than four times the salary of the lowest-paid employee. If you want to award yourself a pay rise, you’ll have to increase the salaries at the bottom.
3. All our branches and subsidiaries overseas will pay local taxes, in full. There will be no clever arrangements to transfer profits to tax havens to avoid tax.
4. No more junk mail trying to persuade people to take out new credit.
5. It is no longer our objective to inflate house prices. An increase in house prices is not an increase in net wealth: it is a transfer from those who do not own houses to those that do. We will try to dampen the housing market, not reinvigorate it.
6. Every bank that is “too big to fail” will be split up into smaller banks. We are going to reverse the cycle of mergers and takeovers that has created these monolithic institutions that have held us all to ransom.
7. There will be no lending for businesses or individuals involved in industries that are harmful to our society and planet. That means no lending to any of the following: the arms trade, advertising and marketing, tobacco, extracting or burning fossil fuels, or the motor industry. Instead, please invest more in clean technologies, technologies appropriate for developing countries, non-profit organisations and community groups.
I know that you have many new shareholders, and it will take time for you to get to know us all. My views won’t necessarily be shared by all your new bosses, but you can be pretty sure that lots of your new bosses think more along these lines than the old lot.
I was a bit hesitant about becoming a bank-owner, but now that it has happened, I think I’m going to enjoy it.
In the US Presidential election, what you see in the media is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg. The real action is on the ground, where decades of experiments and false starts have finally cohered into a new model of social organisation.
We saw glimpses of the potential for this kind of organizing campaign in MoveOn’s 2004 and 2006 volunteer operations, the Dean Campaign and even the Bush and Kerry campaigns. And there are great examples of this kind of organizing if you go back to the social movements of several decades ago. But the Obama campaign is the first in the Internet era to realize the dream of a disciplined, volunteer-driven, bottom-up-AND-top-down, distributed and massively scaleable organizing campaign. For anyone who knows how many times this has failed to happen, this is practically an apocryphal event
